The great Kris Kristofferson - actor, musician, bad-ass - has passed at 88.
Sunday, September 29, 2024
Hallowatch: The Midnight Hour (1985)
Watched: 09/29/2024
Format: YouTube
Viewing: First
Director: Jack Bender
SimonUK has already delved into Halloween movies, and having had already seen everything over the years, he found an ABC TV movie from 1985. That, in the spirit of 1980's, apparently originally aired the day after Halloween at the height of Reaganism (I did not like how TV was run in the 1980's).
If I ever know The Midnight Hour (1985) existed - and it is likely that in 1985, I absolutely did not as I was watching mostly Mr. Ed and GI Joe - I have since forgotten it. And I am pretty sure I would have remembered this.
The basic idea is one that pops up from time-to-time, it's Halloween and someone unleashes dark magic along the way, meaning - in this movie - zombies, werewolves, vampires, etc... appear in a Massachusetts town. And, they sort of take over and turn folks into monsters along the way. Minus one guy who looks a lot like John Hughes, but isn't him.
The movie has a weird clutch of actors you know or say "really?" about. Kevin McCarthy and Dick Van Patten each show up for a few scenes as parents. Levar Burton plays the 1980's staple of the guy who thinks "tonight, me and my lady will finally do it". The lady is played by Shari Belafonte (daughter of Harry) is pretty good as his ladyfriend whose family is tied to witchcraft in the town going back 200 years. Jonelle Allen, TV staple, plays her ancestor. Peter Deluise is in it in a thankless role. Kurtwood Smith gets two scenes as the town cop. Cindy Morgan (RIP) plays the teacher who is... sleeping with Peter Deluise and shows off publicly? The 1980's were wild. This is a TV movie!
And Wolfman Jack, who never saw a gig he couldn't cash in on, is the DJ on the ever present local radio. And, btw, the soundtrack on this is surprisingly solid, including Shari Belafonte trying to create a Halloween single called "Get Dead". But otherwise, oldies hits popular in the 1980's.
The movie is *fun* rather than scary and has a storyline where I'm pretty sure our John Hughes stand-in/ hero bangs a ghost who looks like Betty Cooper. Again, the 1980's were a different time.
What's curious is how much money it looks like this thing cost. TV movies used to be fairly expensive affairs, and this is no exception. It also is basically no better or worse than 80% of the movies people remember fondly from the 1980's, but for some reason, this thing has terrible reviews. Probably because of the dance sequence and lack of visible boobs.
It's fine. I liked the light tone and the wistful approach taken to the romance storyline. And that, basically, the townsfolk lose right up to the end, without even really knowing what's going on. Also, it's free on YouTube and does nail the Halloween vibe. A little spooky, a little horror-ish, a little silly, a little sexy... it's all in there. Maybe not amazing, but it works.
Vax Watch: The Fall Guy - extended cut (2024)
Watched: 09/28/2024
Format: Peacock
Viewing: Second
Director: David Leitch
Huh.
So, as Hannah Waddingham was in a thing, I watched The Fall Guy (2024) in the theater back this spring. The movie was right in the middle of the curve for me. It was funny-ish, had decent stunts - but was basically what I figured it might be. It had a flimsy story to hang it all on. I like Gosling, Blunt, Waddingham, Duke and Hsu. I can give or take Aaron Taylor-Johnson (sorry, dude), but he's good in this!
On Friday at noon, I got my COVID-booster, and felt maybe a little funky on Friday night, and then fine most of Saturday - and then in the late afternoon the effects hit me like a ton of bricks. Unable to take in new information as we headed into evening, I decided the only thing for it was to see some stunts and have some chuckles. I put on the Extended Cut of The Fall Guy, now streaming on Peacock. And - what do you know? The movie was literally much better.
It became pretty clear to me that the vibe director Leitch was going for had been cut down to smithereens in someone's drive to make this movie much shorter. Suddenly, the plot of the movie felt like it gelled. The characters aren't speaking in bullet points and a lot of the humor and meta-ness of the movie is restored. Character-based gags make more sense, and because what was supposed to be there is there, things just work better. We're not racing through the movie so we can get in another showing that day. Ie: The pacing is, in my opinion, fixed.
In short - the theatrical cut was a hatchet job. and I cannot begin to guess how and why that happened the way it did.
I don't know how often I'll put this movie back on, but it's a case-study in how editing impacts the intentions of a film. Leitch clearly meant for people to really enjoy the goofy dialog, repeating gags, and character moments, and a lot of what gets restored is that stuff. We still get the very cool "one shots" like the opening sequence with Gosling going from his trailer to the top of the elevator and falling (sorry for spoilers, but that's the first five minutes). But what's going on with the plot really feels more solid this time - and I think we get some additional murders that weren't there in the theatrical.
Anyhow, if the movie wasn't for you the first time, sorry. I don't think this will fix it. I do think if you were kinda lukewarm on this, it turns it up a notch. If you liked it (I did), huh. You may like it more.
I like Waddingham in the giant glasses. Very cute.
Saturday, September 28, 2024
Raimi Watch: Darkman (1990)
Watched: 09/27/2024
Format: Amazon Prime
Viewing: Unknown
Director: Sam Raimi
Darkman (1990) was released just days after I moved from Austin to North Houston. I was 15. I'd never heard of Sam Raimi or seen Evil Dead. It was the end of the 1980's, when we had movie ratings, but nobody really cared about using them for keeping kids out - it was more of a promise of what a movie could contain. R meant a chance for gore, violence and boobs. Maybe a few F-bombs.
Mostly, I was interested in what was sold as a superhero movie, of an all-new character who had an edge to him. And then a very weird, very cool movie unspooled in front of me.
Darkman was thus, I think, my introduction to Sam Raimi, Liam Neeson and Frances McDormand.* My memory is that I thought the camera work and editing were insane, Neeson had fully thrown himself into the role - which seemed like a lot, and McDormand made for a great love interest as a brainier-than-average "the girl" role in one of these movies.
Friday, September 27, 2024
Dame Maggie Smith Merges With The Infinite
Dame Maggie Smith, who was famous for so many reasons, all good!, has passed. She was 89.
Smith managed the terrific feat of becoming more and more famous and iconic as she hit her later years, starring in international hits like Harry Potter and Downton Abbey. But she also appeared in popular films like The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel in the past 15 years, was in the mid-90's famed Richard III as the Duchess of York, in Hook as Granny Wendy and led the 1969 film The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie as the titular character.
I saw her first in Clash of the Titans, because I was an 80's kid who liked monsters. And I recall her in things later, like Gosford Park and A Room With a View, which is probably where my mind goes when I think of her.
She'll be missed, but, dang. That's a legacy.
Streaming Superhero Media This Week: Penguin, Agatha, ElectraWoman and DynaGirl
Last week, DC and Marvel sort of went head-to-head releasing two very different shows, but with some interesting similarities. Meanwhile, Jamie was scrolling my Amazon account, and Amazon (correctly) alerted me that the 1976 Krofft Superstars show, ElectraWoman and DynaGirl is fully available - and in excellent condition.
DC's take was to put out a very adult-oriented mob-show about what seems to be the rise of Oswald Cobb(lepott), better known as The Penguin in Bat-circles. It's the spin-off from the successful The Batman movie, in which famed handsome-man Colin Farrell put on 40 pounds of latex and a fatsuit to play a character very, very well, that some critics (Paul) have called out for being a role any character actor in LA could have nailed. And maybe he's not wrong.
It's a show that's a wild take that has nothing to do with the source material, uses the name of the character with only minimal care for the comics, and is doing it's own thing while using the DC label. I do not expect Dr. Fate to show up and help out.
Monday, September 23, 2024
90's Watch: Bowfinger (1999)
Watched: 09/21/2024
Format: Max? I don't know.
Viewing: Third
Director: Frank Oz
Selection: Jamie
Two things to begin with: (1) This movie doesn't get discussed enough. It's really funny. (2) I have zero idea why they didn't call this movie "Chubby Rain". It's the funnier, better title.
There were a lot of movies about movie-making in the go-go 90's. Indie filmmakers couldn't get enough of themselves in the 90's indie boom, and most of those movies were not good. But at the end of the 1990's, Steve Martin and Frank Oz put together a genuinely funny movie about making movies and the people who scrape by at the bottom of the Hollywood machine of the day. And while it's silly and I doubt has anything to do with reality, it's good stuff.
Bowfinger (1999) has a great cast, with Steve Martin, Eddie Murphy playing two roles, Terence Stamp, Heather Graham, Christine Baranski, Jamie Kennedy and a shockingly sober 1999 Robert Downey Jr. I hope filming was as fun as it looks like it was, because it seems like everyone is just dicking around having a good time.
Saturday, September 21, 2024
Hamilton/ Ape Watch: King Kong Lives (1986)
Watched: 09/20/2024
Format: Amazon
Viewing; 4th?
Director: John Guillermin/ Charles McCracken
After watching Dante's Peak, I was wanting to see another Linda Hamilton film and talked Dug and K into watching King Kong Lives (1986), a move I am certain they regret.
As a sort of low-level monster-kid of the 1980's, I was thrilled to get a chance to see a *new* King Kong movie, and so went to see the flick in the theater. I loved the *idea* of King Kong, but had only seen pieces of the 1976 movie and none of the original. But read a Kong book to two and had the basic idea down.
And, this movie was part of my realization that not all movies are good. Like, you go to the movies as a kid, and if you can follow the plot, it feels like a winner.* But around this time, I was starting to understand not every movie is "good" or was made because it was a work of art. And, right about the time I saw Kong and Lady Kong making goo-goo eyes at each other, I began realizing this movie was not destined to be the classic its predecessors had been.
Friday, September 20, 2024
JLC Watch: A Fish Called Wanda (1988)
Watched: 09/19/2024
Format: AFS Cinema
Viewing: Unknown
Director: Charles Crichton
Simon and I decided to catch this one again at the cinema.
I've always liked A Fish Called Wanda (1988), and while some items in the film aged poorly, it's still a very, very good comedy with some screwball bits that just kill. I don't know how objective I am about the film as I saw it so young and, at the time, felt like I was watching something aimed, for once, at adults rather than an all-ages comedy, like I was used to. I mean, this isn't far removed, chronologically, from the early Police Academy franchise, which is what an R-Rated comedy looked like in the US that I had previously been watching.
Yet, the film is intensely silly. Everyone is firing on all cylinders, enough so that you can't single out anyone in the film, just your favorite bits or scenes. The entire sequence in which Wanda sneaks into Archie's house to seduce him is *gold* and should be studied by academics. But it's not aimed at 13 year-olds. The comedy comes from a different place that knows goofy, witty, sexy and fun without resorting to feeling like "insert funny sad trombone sound here" is appropriate.
Si and I saw the movie in a shockingly full theater for an 8:30 PM Thursday showing of a movie you can stream from your phone right now. It was a mix of clear die-hards for the movie and people who'd never seen it, I'm guessing, from the gasps and laughing at surprise bits in the film. And, all ages. 20-something hipsters and Grandmas who likely have seen it 25 times.
Was JLC a big reason why I came out to the theater for the movie? You know that's the case. But I had never seen the movie on the big screen, and or with a crowd, and it was a delight to do so.
Here's the Podcast from years ago when Jamie, Si and I talked about the film.
Thursday, September 19, 2024
Noir/ Joan Watch: Female on the Beach (1955)
Watched: 09/18/2024
Format: Criterion
Viewing: First
Director: Joseph Pevney
Y'all know I'm all in for Joan Crawford, and I think Jamie's a fan, too. So, we put this one on from Criterion.
There have to be papers written about Joan in this era and who her movies were aimed at. She'd been kicking around since the Silent Era, was a huge star for a spell in the 1930's, then lost her box office mojo and was declared "box office poison", then had a massive come back in the mid-1940's with Mildred Pierce (recommended). She came back around aged 39 - something to cheer for. And she really is great in that movie. And then she enjoyed real work for some time - including into 1955, when this movie came out.
I am sure there was an audience that knew and loved her from their youth and identified with her as they aged. Further, she kept managing to play the very-much-desired woman here at age 49, when Hollywood still thought once you hit 28, you might as well be a grandma in movies. But women attend movies, and I suspect - based on the female-forward stories (but still very much of the politics of the 1950's) - that her audience were women, and these thrillers served that loyal fanbase.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)