Watched: 10/05/2022
Format: Amazon
Viewing: Unknown
Director: Joel Schumacher
My first takeaway from this is that The Lost Boys (1987) is Rated-R but also clearly a kids movie. It's also not clear *why* it's rated R. There's no nudity, the language is now fine on cable, and it's not even that gross or violent. I saw it in the theater which would have been right around when I also saw RoboCop several states away in the theater, so it wasn't just a local thing. Twelve year-olds, maybe exceptionally tall ones like myself, were just wandering into whatever we wanted to see and the theaters wanted our ticket and Spree money.
But, yeah, I hadn't watched it since high school or early college, and it sure seems aimed at kids when you see it now. The leads (Corey Haim, Jason Patric) are supposed to be in high school, I guess (a whole other question, because this is from the era when high schoolers were shown to be sexually active and drink and smoke pot as a matter-of-course), and Haim seems cast years older than the part is written. What 16 year old needs to be told "it's bathtime!" or goes to sleep in their parent's room? - a quick Wikipedia check confirms that the younger characters were supposed to be 8 years old, originally.
Which makes sense. 1986 was a pivotal year for comics - see the Dark Knight Returns stuff scattered in the Frog Bros.' comic shop. But mainstream America hadn't yet picked up on the shifting content in comics and wouldn't for years. Trust me, I was there. So the characters were intended to be *kids* interested in *kid stuff*.
Look, that's an interesting movie and one I would have maybe watched, but 1987 also saw The Monster Squad tank. And this is the one people remember more than 1987's Near Dark, which I personally prefer as a horror movie. The Lost Boys is an adventure comedy with horror elements - and that's great!
Due to a recent reference to the film in Hulu's Reservation Dogs season finale, I think Jamie became curious and mentioned she'd never seen the film, so I did want to fix that as soon as possible. And, I'll be honest, it's a lot better than I remembered. I didn't remember *not* liking it, but it's genuinely funnier and better considered than I think I was giving it credit for as "a thing I liked when I was 12". It's got great conflicting vibes that play off each other incredibly well, and it doesn't have delusions of grandeur - it's just really good at doing what it's doing.
The cast is made up of stars and talent. I mean, it's a weirdly well populated movie and managed to catch a whole lot of people on their way up between Coreys, Patric Sutherland, Gertz - and workhorses like Weist and Hermann who got to do something fun. And even Alex Winters - who has maybe three lines would be hugely famous within a year or so.
(late edit: I forgot to mention - this movie debuts sparkly vampires! After Alex Winter The Vampire is killed, he sprays blood all over the Frog Bros. In the sunlight, his blood is clearly full of glitter! SPARKLY!!!!)
I don't want to oversell the film, but it was fun! There's some commentary baked in there about the double-edged sword of the joys and folly of eternal youth that gets overshadowed by "whoops, I'm a vampire" and the complete rejection of the possibilities. They don't really do much to support the idea that Star and Michael even really know each other, and Star is never more than "girl" in the movie. The timeline feels like it's 96 hours, tops. Corey Haim's wardrobe feels like it was selected by a crazy person.
But I enjoyed catching it again for nostalgia reasons, but also to reconsider the movie 35 years later.
.jpg)
