As Jamie asked: What is the physics of what's happening here? |
Format: HBOmax
Viewing: third?
Director: Lewis Teague
Woof.
This movie is so bad it has a body count. No, really. The last thing in the credits is a "in memory of" and four names scroll by, including the name of Diane Thomas who created Romancing the Stone, of which this is a sequel.
Even as a kid, when I saw The Jewel of the Nile (1985) in the theater, I thought this movie was "not good". I couldn't have told you why then. Jamie informs me, when I said "this feels like a cash grab" that it was made incredibly quickly on the heels of Romancing the Stone, and that Kathleen Turner initially refused to do it because the script was so bad. Y'all, Kathleen Turner is not wrong.
A weirdly meandering film that just keeps happening, there's essentially a start and an end with no middle during which a bunch of stuff just sort of happens and when our leads are together, they seem like they absolutely *should* part ways as all they can do is argue, it makes the entire third-act rekindling of the romance of the movie make no sense. But there are multiple scenes in the movie that make no sense but happen just so there's something happening on screen - maybe the greatest example of which is "the chief's son wants to fight Jack so he can court Joan" but the Chief's son is in a hut? And they just showed up? And why didn't they just say they were married or betrothed? Like. uggghhhhh.