Batman ponders the Super Package |
Although perhaps less so every year in a world of constantly sub-divided attention, movies and television are the modern cultural touchstones. More than news, political figures or even war, there's nothing like a $400 million dollar movie to get everyone around the world doing the same thing on a Saturday. International dominance of American cinema means that films transcend boundaries and political ideologies as Hollywood carefully crafts non-political films with standard "good v evil" tropes, without ever casting a particular point of view, aside from "evil menace" as the bad guy.
We aren't all just film viewers, we are all film reviewers. We see a film, we consider that film against other films, source material and our particular perspective. Sometimes we write that thought down. The job requires no credentialing, and while some people are paid to look at movies, sum them up and say a few words about the relative merit of a film, others do this endlessly, fruitlessly on their own (cough), but it is something we all do mentally. We are all ready to write a column for the local paper. We all have the best, most nuanced of opinions.
Most of what you see in the press I think of as "reviewers" more than "critics". Somehow, someway, those folks parlayed an interest in going to a bunch of movies every week into a job where they then must writer 1000 words about that movie. A review contains a synopsis, who stars in a movie, and some sort of opinion about the movie. Some make it colorful - and in this era of anyone with a keyboard having the ability to publish, you gotta write some colorful stuff to get clicks.
How to separate a critic from a reviewer?
Well, a reviewer is a person with a local newspaper column or a website. It's me. It's you. Your aunt who posts things to facebook.
There are two definitions of critic, I think.