June the 6th, 1944.
Film. Comics. Sci-Fi. Superheroes. Pulp. Noir. History. Superman. 20th Century Archaeology.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Operation Overlord Anniversary
Nicole reminds me that today is the anniversary of the execution of Operation Overlord, ie: Normandy.
June the 6th, 1944.
June the 6th, 1944.
Superman: The Happiest Fella?
Edit 4/5/2016: For some reason today I started getting hits to this post today. On the outside chance anyone is using this post to bolster their argument that the Superman depicted in Man of Steel or Batman v Superman was a-ok: After I saw Man of Steel opening night at midnight and again about 36 hours later, all of the arguments below regarding why Snyder's Superman portrayal might not be a disaster were thrown out the window.
Snyder's portrayal of Superman had, at best, a tenuous understanding of the character and his motivations, and the attempts to update the character did not achieve anything in the realm of reality. Following the mentality of a teenager filtering reality through a PS2, Snyder abandoned the character's path of discovery and, instead, simply blessed him as a tactical weapon.
While certainly some of what I say below dovetails with Snyder's own arguments for his movies, his execution is a failure. I sincerely hope anyone who is out there saying this movie really "gets" Superman takes a moment to understand that anyone who has been a fan of Superman since before 2013 heartily disagrees with that assessment. While there is certainly some of the core of Superman in Man of Steel, the movie, its creators and studio have failed to understand Superman's desire to inspire through deeds and actions, and that is its own reward. Not the emotionally crippled man-child told by his parents to stay home and play videogames.
The original post begins below:
There have been a lot of posts (hi, Max!) and articles by longtime Superman fans regarding the to-date seemingly somber tone of the new Superman film, Man of Steel.
Folks are worried about a "grim'n'gritty" Superman versus the cheerful fellow who takes delight in his powers that you've seen since Superman's first appearance in Action Comics #1. That imagery has been a part of the "discovery" part of the story for Superman in one form or another in all sorts of representations, from Superboy comics, to the animated series, to Superman Returns and Superman: The Movie where we see a young Clark Kent running faster than a freight train and beating Brad and the gang back past the Kent homestead. And, of course, the absolutely terrific "reveal" sequence when Superman saves Lois and then runs around Metropolis saving the day.
Probably the most joyful you're likely to see Superman is in Superman: The Movie after The Man of Steel first appears and then flies around Metropolis performing super good deeds.
In fact, I've gone on record as saying that the key to my understanding of Superman in many ways is the moment wherein he saves Lois, reminds her of the relative safety of air travel, and then turns around and lets loose with this huge grin before flying away:
Snyder's portrayal of Superman had, at best, a tenuous understanding of the character and his motivations, and the attempts to update the character did not achieve anything in the realm of reality. Following the mentality of a teenager filtering reality through a PS2, Snyder abandoned the character's path of discovery and, instead, simply blessed him as a tactical weapon.
While certainly some of what I say below dovetails with Snyder's own arguments for his movies, his execution is a failure. I sincerely hope anyone who is out there saying this movie really "gets" Superman takes a moment to understand that anyone who has been a fan of Superman since before 2013 heartily disagrees with that assessment. While there is certainly some of the core of Superman in Man of Steel, the movie, its creators and studio have failed to understand Superman's desire to inspire through deeds and actions, and that is its own reward. Not the emotionally crippled man-child told by his parents to stay home and play videogames.
The original post begins below:
 |
| Just up here in space, smiling at nobody |
There have been a lot of posts (hi, Max!) and articles by longtime Superman fans regarding the to-date seemingly somber tone of the new Superman film, Man of Steel.
Folks are worried about a "grim'n'gritty" Superman versus the cheerful fellow who takes delight in his powers that you've seen since Superman's first appearance in Action Comics #1. That imagery has been a part of the "discovery" part of the story for Superman in one form or another in all sorts of representations, from Superboy comics, to the animated series, to Superman Returns and Superman: The Movie where we see a young Clark Kent running faster than a freight train and beating Brad and the gang back past the Kent homestead. And, of course, the absolutely terrific "reveal" sequence when Superman saves Lois and then runs around Metropolis saving the day.
Probably the most joyful you're likely to see Superman is in Superman: The Movie after The Man of Steel first appears and then flies around Metropolis performing super good deeds.
In fact, I've gone on record as saying that the key to my understanding of Superman in many ways is the moment wherein he saves Lois, reminds her of the relative safety of air travel, and then turns around and lets loose with this huge grin before flying away:
 |
| "Man, I wish she'd fall out of a helicopter EVERY day!" |
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
And then, in 2013, DC Comics discovered hypertext fiction
If there's any doubt that DC Comics has moved to a number crunching behemoth of creative despair, today form Randy I received a link pointing me to a story about DC's latest effort, Multiverse Comics. Basically, digital choose your own adventure comics.
At this point in the tenure of Diane Nelson, any hope for a creative renaissance at the company should be replaced with more of a visual of someone selling t-shirts outside the Louvre with a picture of Mona Lisa in a bikini top with a knife gripped in her teeth.*
There's a lot of reasons to sort of want to put your head down on the table about this one.
In 1991 or so the first hypertext fiction appeared, which promised branching narratives and the ability to dig further into a narrative - all in standard prose. If you were going to raves and enjoying smart drinks in 1994, it all sounded like a nifty part of our bright future of this series of tubes called "the interwebs". Just get yourself a 1600 baud modem and go nuts.
"But, hey The League," you might say. "It's 2013! Where can I purchase some of this hypertext fiction that's clearly the wave of the future?"
Tragically, it went the way of the Dippin' Dots and may not have been the ice cream/ preferred narrative construct of the future.
At this point in the tenure of Diane Nelson, any hope for a creative renaissance at the company should be replaced with more of a visual of someone selling t-shirts outside the Louvre with a picture of Mona Lisa in a bikini top with a knife gripped in her teeth.*
There's a lot of reasons to sort of want to put your head down on the table about this one.
In 1991 or so the first hypertext fiction appeared, which promised branching narratives and the ability to dig further into a narrative - all in standard prose. If you were going to raves and enjoying smart drinks in 1994, it all sounded like a nifty part of our bright future of this series of tubes called "the interwebs". Just get yourself a 1600 baud modem and go nuts.
"But, hey The League," you might say. "It's 2013! Where can I purchase some of this hypertext fiction that's clearly the wave of the future?"
Tragically, it went the way of the Dippin' Dots and may not have been the ice cream/ preferred narrative construct of the future.
Monday, June 3, 2013
The Internet Archive and What I Do For a Living
Pal JuanD sent me this video. I'm sharing it because it's a really, really good glimpse into the problems I work on every day at work. Sort of. Half the time I think I'm just looking for receipts or figuring out how many stuffed mushrooms we can afford on our conference's cheap-o budget.
Man, I wish I could just focus on the technical problems.
Internet Archive from Deepspeed media on Vimeo.
Our office actually has two missions. We're providing tools to enable researchers to publish born-digital content in both traditional ways (but using new technologies for peer review journals, etc..) and providing options for new media options such as blogs or other modes of scholarly writing. And we're doing this whole preservation bit of both scanned materials and born-digital materials.
What we're doing that's somewhat different from the video is that we're attempting to capture all of the scholarly output from universities and bring it up and online - not scan kid's books that we think someone else will likely handle.
Of course, a lot of people I work with are cogs who don't necessarily get the bigger picture, or work for people who can't pull it all together to get the big picture and so a lot of mistakes are made. A lot of preservable items are lost. The common consensus is that in 200 years, this early digital era will be a dark ages in many ways as we still aren't smart about keeping anything digital. We still think of print copies as the final edition.
As we also commonly say, it's going to take a lot of people retiring or dying before we have a generation promoted to decision making positions who will work with the technology to make sure the digital copies aren't seen as something to rot on a 3.5" floppy in a drawer.
Anyway, great video.
Man, I wish I could just focus on the technical problems.
Internet Archive from Deepspeed media on Vimeo.
Our office actually has two missions. We're providing tools to enable researchers to publish born-digital content in both traditional ways (but using new technologies for peer review journals, etc..) and providing options for new media options such as blogs or other modes of scholarly writing. And we're doing this whole preservation bit of both scanned materials and born-digital materials.
What we're doing that's somewhat different from the video is that we're attempting to capture all of the scholarly output from universities and bring it up and online - not scan kid's books that we think someone else will likely handle.
Of course, a lot of people I work with are cogs who don't necessarily get the bigger picture, or work for people who can't pull it all together to get the big picture and so a lot of mistakes are made. A lot of preservable items are lost. The common consensus is that in 200 years, this early digital era will be a dark ages in many ways as we still aren't smart about keeping anything digital. We still think of print copies as the final edition.
As we also commonly say, it's going to take a lot of people retiring or dying before we have a generation promoted to decision making positions who will work with the technology to make sure the digital copies aren't seen as something to rot on a 3.5" floppy in a drawer.
Anyway, great video.
Signal Watches "Brick" from 2005
Between his role as the adorable kid on 90's sitcome 3rd Rock from the Sun and his leap to leading man status in 2012, Joseph Gordon-Levitt made a peculiar film with Looper writer/ director Rian Johnson.
I cannot begin to imagine how my high school brain would have dealt with this movie, but I am fairly certain I would have believed it to be The Best Movie Ever. Basically, it's a faux-Dashiell Hammett mystery set in a high school with a hard-boiled detective replaced by a hard-boiled high school senior, playing the angles and trying to get to the mystery that opens the film, of what happened to his ex-girlfriend who had reached out to him days before for help, seemingly wrapped up in some trouble with local drug peddlers.
The film is both curiously believable as a low-level crime story happening in the margins around high schoolers, just outside the periphery of parent or teacher supervision. But because of the similarities to the stories of Hammett and Chandler that have so permeated western fiction, it's also an interesting point of view that the sorts of things we usually tie to the adult world we know are happening just out of view even in suburban sprawl at public high schools.
I do wish some of the writing were a bit tighter, but it's a signature move of Chandler or Hammett work to see the plot become so twisted it takes a chart to keep it all straight. That sort of thing pays off well in repeated viewings, and while I did watch this movie years ago (probably in 2007) I'll probably not wait 6 years between viewings again so I don't feel like I'm just playing catch-up the whole time.
Joseph Gordon-Leviitt shows chops that so many child actors dream of having but never develop as they get older and have the usual post-child star tail spin. If you want to see some of what materialized on the big screen in 2012 with this guy in an earlier stage, I think JGL was already pretty excellent here.
I cannot begin to imagine how my high school brain would have dealt with this movie, but I am fairly certain I would have believed it to be The Best Movie Ever. Basically, it's a faux-Dashiell Hammett mystery set in a high school with a hard-boiled detective replaced by a hard-boiled high school senior, playing the angles and trying to get to the mystery that opens the film, of what happened to his ex-girlfriend who had reached out to him days before for help, seemingly wrapped up in some trouble with local drug peddlers.
The film is both curiously believable as a low-level crime story happening in the margins around high schoolers, just outside the periphery of parent or teacher supervision. But because of the similarities to the stories of Hammett and Chandler that have so permeated western fiction, it's also an interesting point of view that the sorts of things we usually tie to the adult world we know are happening just out of view even in suburban sprawl at public high schools.
I do wish some of the writing were a bit tighter, but it's a signature move of Chandler or Hammett work to see the plot become so twisted it takes a chart to keep it all straight. That sort of thing pays off well in repeated viewings, and while I did watch this movie years ago (probably in 2007) I'll probably not wait 6 years between viewings again so I don't feel like I'm just playing catch-up the whole time.
Joseph Gordon-Leviitt shows chops that so many child actors dream of having but never develop as they get older and have the usual post-child star tail spin. If you want to see some of what materialized on the big screen in 2012 with this guy in an earlier stage, I think JGL was already pretty excellent here.
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Sort of Going Through a Thing as I Downsize my Comic Stuff Collection
 |
| my office from some time ago, when I was doing some other renovation work in there |
For clarification - the front room of our house had been intended to be a sort of reading room and casual conversation room, and the bookshelves were full of statues from DC Direct and other places, and it was a real conversation starter. But nobody ever wanted to actually sit in there. And for some reason the dogs go crazy when I go in there to try and read. Also, I have my office, which was where I'd put my action figures, toys, comics and a whole bunch of other stuff.
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Amazing color footage of Superman Day at 1939 World's Fair!
This is really remarkable. All those kids in Superman shirts! It's hard to imagine, this was just about 1 year after Superman debuted in the comics and already the character was a hit with the masses.
You can see DC publisher Harry Donenfeld riding an elephant, Jack Liebowitz and MC Gaines, and Jerry Siegel. I half think the woman at the end might be Siegel's first wife, but I'm not sure.
I've read about so many of these people over the years, it's wild to see them in living color.
This is all before DC really settled on the looks of Superman "S" shiefd, as evidenced by the costume and the kids' shirts.
I'm always amazed to see footage like this, candid shots of folks on the street, to see what people actually looked like and how they dressed, rather than relying on the soft filter of the Hollywood lens.
You can see DC publisher Harry Donenfeld riding an elephant, Jack Liebowitz and MC Gaines, and Jerry Siegel. I half think the woman at the end might be Siegel's first wife, but I'm not sure.
I've read about so many of these people over the years, it's wild to see them in living color.
This is all before DC really settled on the looks of Superman "S" shiefd, as evidenced by the costume and the kids' shirts.
I'm always amazed to see footage like this, candid shots of folks on the street, to see what people actually looked like and how they dressed, rather than relying on the soft filter of the Hollywood lens.
Matty Turns 40
League Pal Matt - who you rarely see mentioned here, basically because he thinks genre stuff is dumb and will not play ball - has turned 40.
Here's Matt with Nicole last year on his birthday. We may have had a few cocktails at the time this pic was snapped.
Matt and Nicole are in Berkeley with the California squad. We trust they will ensure Matt has a festive b-day.
Here he is by a rock somewhere near the ocean. I don't know what the hell he's doing there. Maybe trying to pick a spot for the cover of his album of sea shanties.
Happy 40th, man. You don't look a day over 52.
Here's Matt with Nicole last year on his birthday. We may have had a few cocktails at the time this pic was snapped.
 |
| Ladypal Nicole with Matty, the birthday boy |
Here he is by a rock somewhere near the ocean. I don't know what the hell he's doing there. Maybe trying to pick a spot for the cover of his album of sea shanties.
 |
| you can tell he's really enjoying himself |
Happy 40th, man. You don't look a day over 52.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Supermarathon! Superman Returns
I've already written plenty on this movie over the past 7 years. I mean, a lot. Leading up to the movie, I did a whole "Summer of Superman" theme, and it was sort of a thing. I even got re-blogged by Pop Candy at USA Today thanks to our own JimD.
I won't deluge you with all the links where the movie got a mention, but here are a few. I'm not proud of some of this.
The first blush comments
When the press (that had oddly really been pulling for this movie to fail) started reporting with glee that there would be no sequel and I got a little pissy
Watching the movie again about 5 months later
And then in November when I watched the movie during my "let's review everything in 2012" deal
I don't think my opinions or feelings have changed much since that viewing in November 2012. Superman Returns is a strange movie. Beautifully shot, amazing art and set design, and it really swung for the fences when it came to subtext and layering. But given public opinion and some wonky bits, it's a mixed bag.
I won't deluge you with all the links where the movie got a mention, but here are a few. I'm not proud of some of this.
The first blush comments
When the press (that had oddly really been pulling for this movie to fail) started reporting with glee that there would be no sequel and I got a little pissy
Watching the movie again about 5 months later
And then in November when I watched the movie during my "let's review everything in 2012" deal
I don't think my opinions or feelings have changed much since that viewing in November 2012. Superman Returns is a strange movie. Beautifully shot, amazing art and set design, and it really swung for the fences when it came to subtext and layering. But given public opinion and some wonky bits, it's a mixed bag.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
No Post Friday - Wonder Woman stands in
 |
| PEW PEW PEW!!! PING PING PING!!!! |
 |
| one of you once mentioned how much you loved this cover. Here you go! |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)