Comics artist and creator of Batman's arch-nemesis, The Joker, Jerry Robinson has merged with The Infinite.
There are fact-filled eulogies and appreciations drifting in from all over the internet, so I'd rather link to better-written and better-researched articles and eulogies.
From CBR
From Newsarama
Jerry lived to the age of 89, but in his youth was part of the comics explosion, working side by side with the pioneers and greats of industry. He was also a comics historian, and advocate for creator's rights.
With the production of The Dark Knight as a major film (and featuring The Joker), Robinson was given emeritus status at DC Comics, and has enjoyed a close relationship with the company the last few years.
Another of the great ones has passed.
Film. Comics. Sci-Fi. Superheroes. Pulp. Noir. History. Superman. 20th Century Archaeology.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
So, someone has made an all new Three Stooges movie
...I find this idea bizarre.
Yes, the Three Stooges were characters portrayed by actors. I do not labor under any illusions that the three Stooges really went about poking one another in the eye, slap-sticking each other and pulling one another's nose, no matter how totally awesome that illusion might be. But its also, for this human, impossible to separate the characters from the actors. Hell, the Stooges didn't just hire some new guy to play Curly. They replaced him with Shemp.
Which opens the door to the whole "Fake Shemp" discussion, which is sort of morbidly fascinating.
Now, according to my intensive Stooges research, the Stooges struggled for years with their third stooge, and it could be said that somehow that makes them all fungible. Hell, after Curly and Larry died, Moe did continue on with Shemp, then Joe, then Curly Joe. Then a replacement Larry. Then, when Moe died, an "all new Stooges" formed from the replacements, but who the hell remembers those guys?
The point is - Moe, Larry and Curly are so tightly bound between actors and characters, bringing them back in 2012 with new faces and actors trying to emulate the original formula seems ill-conceived.
In all honestly, I originally thought when I heard there was a movie about the Three Stooges, it would be a biopic about the men behind the eye-poking. It wasn't until I watched the new trailer that I learned otherwise.
I don't think you'd see a new Little Tramp movie. Or a new Marx Bros. movie. Laurel & Hardy. Abbott & Costello. A new Lucy TV show, etc... And while, yeah, we'd all like to see some new Stooges movies*, if none suddenly surface, I think its okay to just live with the many, many shorts and features they released.
Also - these guys, all talented, just aren't the Stooges. They're guys approximating what the Stooges refined every day of their lives for 30 years. The timing looks off, and it looks like half-realized impersonations of well known characters more than, well, I guess just BEING Moe Howard
I guess its a kids' movie, but given current trends in parenting, I'm hard-pressed to believe that the eye-poking, face-slapping antics I enjoyed as a youth will go over well today.
All this said - I'm not a huge Stooges fan. I don't dislike the Three Stooges, but it isn't something I watched all that often as a kid, and they just didn't air much anymore by the time I was an adult. I appreciate that they have a cult following (you know who you are), and I am certain someone is thrilled to license the image of their dead relatives to get this movie made, but I'm not sure how this is going to work.
Prove me wrong, new Stooges movie directed by the ever-increasingly-dull Farrelly Brothers.
*your mileage will vary on that sentiment
Yes, the Three Stooges were characters portrayed by actors. I do not labor under any illusions that the three Stooges really went about poking one another in the eye, slap-sticking each other and pulling one another's nose, no matter how totally awesome that illusion might be. But its also, for this human, impossible to separate the characters from the actors. Hell, the Stooges didn't just hire some new guy to play Curly. They replaced him with Shemp.
Which opens the door to the whole "Fake Shemp" discussion, which is sort of morbidly fascinating.
Now, according to my intensive Stooges research, the Stooges struggled for years with their third stooge, and it could be said that somehow that makes them all fungible. Hell, after Curly and Larry died, Moe did continue on with Shemp, then Joe, then Curly Joe. Then a replacement Larry. Then, when Moe died, an "all new Stooges" formed from the replacements, but who the hell remembers those guys?
 |
| the classic formula |
The point is - Moe, Larry and Curly are so tightly bound between actors and characters, bringing them back in 2012 with new faces and actors trying to emulate the original formula seems ill-conceived.
In all honestly, I originally thought when I heard there was a movie about the Three Stooges, it would be a biopic about the men behind the eye-poking. It wasn't until I watched the new trailer that I learned otherwise.
I don't think you'd see a new Little Tramp movie. Or a new Marx Bros. movie. Laurel & Hardy. Abbott & Costello. A new Lucy TV show, etc... And while, yeah, we'd all like to see some new Stooges movies*, if none suddenly surface, I think its okay to just live with the many, many shorts and features they released.
Also - these guys, all talented, just aren't the Stooges. They're guys approximating what the Stooges refined every day of their lives for 30 years. The timing looks off, and it looks like half-realized impersonations of well known characters more than, well, I guess just BEING Moe Howard
I guess its a kids' movie, but given current trends in parenting, I'm hard-pressed to believe that the eye-poking, face-slapping antics I enjoyed as a youth will go over well today.
All this said - I'm not a huge Stooges fan. I don't dislike the Three Stooges, but it isn't something I watched all that often as a kid, and they just didn't air much anymore by the time I was an adult. I appreciate that they have a cult following (you know who you are), and I am certain someone is thrilled to license the image of their dead relatives to get this movie made, but I'm not sure how this is going to work.
Prove me wrong, new Stooges movie directed by the ever-increasingly-dull Farrelly Brothers.
*your mileage will vary on that sentiment
Happy Birthday to The Dug
Schniekies.
Today is the birthday of The Dug, brother of League-wife, Jamie.
Happy B-Day, Dug. I won't reveal how old you are, even if I get punched in the stomach forty times. Why, if forty angry badgers were biting my shins, I'd never say how old you'd become. For forty days and forty nights I could resist questioning that would reveal your true age.
Happy B-Day, Dug. May it be contain the fun of 40 Nukies.
Today is the birthday of The Dug, brother of League-wife, Jamie.
 |
| I'm sure today is important for other reasons, too |
Happy B-Day, Dug. May it be contain the fun of 40 Nukies.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
The Mass Delusion of The Muppets
I was watching the National Tree Lighting Ceremony on PBS, and First Lady Michelle Obama took to the stage to read 'Twas the Night Before Christmas to a bunch of kids. No sooner had she sat down and pulled up the book than who should pop up beside her but Kermit the Frog?
The wife of the President of the United States of America turned, greeted Kermit, and off they went reading the story together. Because, you know, talking frogs make total sense.
And it struck me, its pretty awesome that we've all agreed that it doesn't matter where or when The Muppets show up, we're all going to act like that is not a sock puppet, we're going to always join in with the illusion Jim Henson and Co. cast with The Muppet Show 30-odd years ago, and we're going to insist on a reality where The Muppets are absolutely real.
Its like if I were presenting at a conference and looked over and Rowlf were on my panel, I'd know exactly how to deal with it. Just say "oh, hi Rowlf!" like its no big deal, join in his banter, and then follow his cue if he bursts into song.
I know that's not how it works, but that's the illusion we've agreed makes complete sense to us all. The Muppets can just show up, we're on a first name basis, and we're going to have a little conversation in front of all these people.
Thanks to the arrival of the movie, which I highly recommend you see for some good cinema fun*, The Muppets have been popping up all over the place, from Ellen to Saturday Night Live. And, of course, there's a difference in that actors and hosts can interact directly with The Muppets. Its not like a cartoon or CGI bit that will be subbed in later. There's a felt thing with eyes, hands and expressions that you can react to. And I think that helps.
But I do think its pretty awesome, in general, that we're all in on this Muppets thing.
*and some GREAT commie propaganda!
The wife of the President of the United States of America turned, greeted Kermit, and off they went reading the story together. Because, you know, talking frogs make total sense.
 |
| Mrs. Obama does not know Kermit is a member of the Green Party. |
Its like if I were presenting at a conference and looked over and Rowlf were on my panel, I'd know exactly how to deal with it. Just say "oh, hi Rowlf!" like its no big deal, join in his banter, and then follow his cue if he bursts into song.
I know that's not how it works, but that's the illusion we've agreed makes complete sense to us all. The Muppets can just show up, we're on a first name basis, and we're going to have a little conversation in front of all these people.
 |
| see, I would be prepared for this eventuality |
But I do think its pretty awesome, in general, that we're all in on this Muppets thing.
*and some GREAT commie propaganda!
SW Advent Calendar: December 6
The Disney Comics gang has a very weird way of decorating their tree. And that just looks terribly poke-y if you ask me. Also, where are Donald's nephews? On the back side of the tree, unloved and unwanted, I suppose.
Monday, December 5, 2011
The New 52 and Creeping Ambivalence
As I knew it might, and as I've discussed here before, DC's New 52 and its attention on supposedly newer and younger readers (a possibly necessary marketing step) feels less and less like its working for me every week. And its an odd feeling.
I'm still excited by a few books. Animal Man. Swamp Thing. Batwoman. Action Comics. But as time wears on, the approach DC has taken in the relaunch, of hiring the same old hands and just sort of re-jiggering the DCU with no rhyme or reason to it... the sheer half-baked approach to the effort on so many titles, is just beginning to wear on me as an adult reader and a long-time DC fan.
But the bottom line is that while some of these comics are sort of bad, most of them are just plain not very good. They aren't special or worth the time or money associated with them. They're the filler material of C-list comics that, for some reason, always seem to just exist the same way shows like NBC's The Sing Off manage to show on television for no real reason other than that they generate modestly more money than the budget and are less embarrassing than going to a test signal and admitting you ran out of stuff worth showing.
I'm still excited by a few books. Animal Man. Swamp Thing. Batwoman. Action Comics. But as time wears on, the approach DC has taken in the relaunch, of hiring the same old hands and just sort of re-jiggering the DCU with no rhyme or reason to it... the sheer half-baked approach to the effort on so many titles, is just beginning to wear on me as an adult reader and a long-time DC fan.
But the bottom line is that while some of these comics are sort of bad, most of them are just plain not very good. They aren't special or worth the time or money associated with them. They're the filler material of C-list comics that, for some reason, always seem to just exist the same way shows like NBC's The Sing Off manage to show on television for no real reason other than that they generate modestly more money than the budget and are less embarrassing than going to a test signal and admitting you ran out of stuff worth showing.
SW Advent Calendar December 5: It's Krampus Day!!!
Forget Black Friday or Cyber Monday. Your Holiday season can officially begin with Krampus Day! Yes, that merry old emobdiment of terror is here for your children, just in time to remind them that being "naughty" may have grave consequences beyond making your parents buy you the XBox Santa refuses to deliver.
It's Krampus! Keepin' Christmas REAL.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Signal Watch Reads: Superboy #3
Superboy #3
Free at Last, Free at Last
writer - Scott Lobdell
penciller - RB Silva
inker - Rob Lean
colorists - Richard & Tanya Horie
letterer - Carlos Mangual
editor - Chris Conroy
If I may... I hate the title of this issue. I know its a famous phrase, but it does have weight. Using Dr. King's words to title a Superboy issue that is entirely about made-up science fiction stuff... it just seems to unintentionally diminish the meaning of the "I Have a Dream" speech, which I am certain was not the intention of DC, but that's why Lobdell and DC's editors just need to be smarter.
Free at Last, Free at Last
writer - Scott Lobdell
penciller - RB Silva
inker - Rob Lean
colorists - Richard & Tanya Horie
letterer - Carlos Mangual
editor - Chris Conroy
If I may... I hate the title of this issue. I know its a famous phrase, but it does have weight. Using Dr. King's words to title a Superboy issue that is entirely about made-up science fiction stuff... it just seems to unintentionally diminish the meaning of the "I Have a Dream" speech, which I am certain was not the intention of DC, but that's why Lobdell and DC's editors just need to be smarter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)