Over the years, it was somehow mostly forgotten that at one point, a lot of early movies were tinted for color. The film might be shot in black and white, but the prints themselves would be processed with a tint to have color that evoked the mood, etc... However, by 1925 there was already a two-color process, and that's what you're seeing here.
The Lon Chaney starring Phantom of the Opera (1925) is a beautiful movie if you've never seen it. At least some of the prints feature color, and the Masque of the Red Death sequence, even without color, was always powerful stuff. With color - I think it's amazing.
At this point in the film, the Phantom has been causing problems (including deaths) but has been unseen. Here he strides into the middle of a party of the wealthiest in Paris and threatens them all from behind the skeleton mask of Death.
Here it is - silent. You can provide your own music in your own head.
You can see the color better here, but I forewarn you, its synched to the music of the Broadway musical of the same name.
In the first movie and the book, unlike the musical, The Phantom is a spooky bad-ass. So if all you know if Andrew Lloyd-Webber, I recommend looking up the 1925 film.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
October Watch! Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)
If you've never seen Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954), it's an absolute blast of a movie and pretty much sets the tone for every succeeding creature feature to follow - but it also leans a bit on the set-up of movies like King Kong. Intrepid explorers/ scientists have some vital but benign evidence, return to the spot far from civilization where it was found, and modern man can't deal with the havoc that ensues when an unexpected monster appears (and makes off with the stunningly attractive woman along for the ride).
Creature is fun partially because of the raw science-adventure tone that movies like Prometheus try to capture, of lantern jawed scientists throwing themselves into the path of danger in the name of discovery - along with a scrubby but affable crew along for the adventure who know their protocols are there for a reason. As well as knowing natives may be superstitious, but they're also not crazy, so sometimes you just avoid their "Black Lagoons" if they suggest that's not a good place to bring your boat. But: SCIENCE.
Creature is fun partially because of the raw science-adventure tone that movies like Prometheus try to capture, of lantern jawed scientists throwing themselves into the path of danger in the name of discovery - along with a scrubby but affable crew along for the adventure who know their protocols are there for a reason. As well as knowing natives may be superstitious, but they're also not crazy, so sometimes you just avoid their "Black Lagoons" if they suggest that's not a good place to bring your boat. But: SCIENCE.
Happy Birthday, Bela Lugosi
Today is Bela Lugosi's 130th Birthday.
Born Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó in Hungary, Lugosi arrived in America in the early 1920s. By 1927 he was cast as Count Dracula in a Broadway show.
Most famous for his role as Dracula in the 1931 film, Lugosi found himself typecast and caught in a strange whirlwind of the Hollywood system which kept him in spook pictures, more or less, his entire career.
It's the Halloween season. Go out and get yourself a copy of Dracula if you've never seen the original movie. He's pretty darn good.
Born Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó in Hungary, Lugosi arrived in America in the early 1920s. By 1927 he was cast as Count Dracula in a Broadway show.
Most famous for his role as Dracula in the 1931 film, Lugosi found himself typecast and caught in a strange whirlwind of the Hollywood system which kept him in spook pictures, more or less, his entire career.
It's the Halloween season. Go out and get yourself a copy of Dracula if you've never seen the original movie. He's pretty darn good.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Octoberama! Fridays with Elvira!
DC rebranded "House of Mystery" as an Elvira book, which was kind of an interesting idea |
In addition to her work in TV and movies, Elvira has been a fixture of comics off and on since the 1980's. She was at DC on and off for years, and had a series at Claypool comics as recently as 2005 or 2006.
She has also had various pinball machines and casino slot machines made under her name.
This game is totally fun in real life, and recently became available as an iPhone app.
I'd argue the sequel is even more fun, but is not available as an app.
She's also got her own slot machine.
This isn't to mention all the toys and dolls that are out there in her likeness.
Truly, the lady's copyrighted image is applicable just about anywhere. I look forward to sitting down to breakfast and my Elvira-O's.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Signal Reads: Solaris (1961)
There is nothing like a beloved Polish sci-fi novel written in 1961 to make you feel like a complete idiot.
That was a better book than I was a listener.
I once saw the Russian film of Solaris circa 1994, but I'll be honest. I'd had a lot to drink, and I don't remember anything about it at all, but when people would ask, I'd say: Yeah, I've seen Solaris. It wasn't exactly a lie, but it wasn't exactly true that I remembered seeing Solaris. It's like saying you've been to San Diego, but you've only been to the airport.
So, on Jason's fiance's dad's suggestion, (I could have actually sat down and read the book, but that isn't going to happen, so) I purchased and listened to the audiobook of Solaris by Stanislaw Lem. It's no lie that Greg is a much smarter man than myself (and you, too. Seriously, meet Greg some time), and while I am sure Greg got more out of it than me, the book didn't disappoint.
It was also the rare book that I finished with the absolute certainty that I was going to read it again, because while I had grasped much of the book, I also knew that, thanks to the linear format of the audiobook, what I would have done to re-read certain parts, to flip back and forth in the book to piece it together when new information presented itself - I was just caught up in the flow of the story being told as it unspooled on my iPod.
That was a better book than I was a listener.
I once saw the Russian film of Solaris circa 1994, but I'll be honest. I'd had a lot to drink, and I don't remember anything about it at all, but when people would ask, I'd say: Yeah, I've seen Solaris. It wasn't exactly a lie, but it wasn't exactly true that I remembered seeing Solaris. It's like saying you've been to San Diego, but you've only been to the airport.
So, on Jason's fiance's dad's suggestion, (I could have actually sat down and read the book, but that isn't going to happen, so) I purchased and listened to the audiobook of Solaris by Stanislaw Lem. It's no lie that Greg is a much smarter man than myself (and you, too. Seriously, meet Greg some time), and while I am sure Greg got more out of it than me, the book didn't disappoint.
It was also the rare book that I finished with the absolute certainty that I was going to read it again, because while I had grasped much of the book, I also knew that, thanks to the linear format of the audiobook, what I would have done to re-read certain parts, to flip back and forth in the book to piece it together when new information presented itself - I was just caught up in the flow of the story being told as it unspooled on my iPod.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Octoberama! Janet Leigh!
Janet Leigh would go on to have a terrific scare pedigree with appearances in Psycho and Halloween H20. Not to mention birthing Jamie Lee Curtis, who would launch the Halloween movie franchise.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Lazy Post - Intros of swiftly canceled 80's Sci-Fi shows
Here's the explanation/ origin story for TV's Automan.
When you think about all the work WB put into making Green Lantern's costume work in the movie, it all seems sort of silly. This looks just as good, really.
Here's the intro to a weekly episode.
When you think about all the work WB put into making Green Lantern's costume work in the movie, it all seems sort of silly. This looks just as good, really.
Here's the intro to a weekly episode.
Thinking out loud about a few things around DC Entertainment
Huh.
So, for the first time since probably 2003, I didn't look at the solicitations for DC Comics' coming books the day they were released. I just forgot to do so. But that's sort of where I'm at with DC these days.
It's time, once again, for my: "Something is Up at DC" Amazing Criswell Psychic Predictions.
Cartoons:
DC is part of WB, which also owns The Cartoon Network. About a year and a half ago, we first heard of the coming "DC Nation" block of cartoons, which never turned into a full block. It was an hour with some small cartoons tucked in, lasting about 80 seconds or so apiece. They were pretty great.
Season 2 of Cartoon Network started about three weeks ago, and then last Saturday - it just wasn't on. They showed a different program in that time slot. The same day we got an announcement that (a) they were pushing the show back to January and (b) DC Animation was releasing a few films, not the least of which was DC's Flashpoint story which led into the New 52.
I'm wondering - and this is just me talking out loud - if DC has decided that they don't want to do the New 52 in their new animated shows, but that was a last minute decision. DC had already released one Justice League movie based in the world of Young Justice, and I assume that Flashpoint would be the same sort of thing - spinning the New 52 Universe into the Young Justice world - or eliminating it so they could do a New 52 Justice League cartoon.
Maybe that isn't happening. Or maybe its a far greater problem to introduce the New 52 to a casual audience than devoted comic shop geeks and its causing all sorts of issues.
Or maybe they're finding that DC comics characters can't draw in an audience for a television program. Honestly, both the Green Lantern cartoon and Young Justice are really, really dark shows. Avengers may be dopey and badly voice-acted, but the characters don't all seem perpetually miserable, and that's the Marvel cartoon, about heroes with real-life problems. Go figure.
But DC and CN pulled the plug on Batman: Brave and the Bold, which was a terrific program, so what do I know?
Or, DC is holding off until the new Batman and other cartoons are in the can and they can have a true programming block of 2 hours or so. Which would be keen.
The bottom line is - WB's investment in DC as a multimedia IP farm just went kaput very publicly on DVR's all across the country.
Meanwhile over in comics - The Supersuit
I have to think someone noticed Superman's new costume is more trouble than its worth.
In the January solicits, Superboy seems to have inherited the current costume, and Superman is back to jeans and t-shirt.
My guess is he winds up with something more movie-centric without the collar, or we get something much closer to the original suit.
I don't think anyone liked that supersuit. And it would have been nice to see two artists draw it the same way. Ie: Do not let Jim Lee design your supersuits anymore.
Meanwhile, Steel's new look is spoiled on the cover for Animal Man. I like John Henry Irons, but have no fixed idea regarding his look except: it's gray or shiny metal. So, this is fine.
At the end of the day, no matter how many jokes you make about the red trunks, etc... Superman is an icon first and a character second. It's a bit like trying to hip up the Coca-Cola label or a Campbell's Soup can. It's a nice design exercise, but on the shelf, its not what people are looking for.
The Wonder Woman pants/ no pants debate was surely of some use to DC. At least they understood that when she's in pants, nobody has any idea what they're looking at and they're trying to mess with 70 years of brand recognition. Its just a bad idea (surely as bad as the current DC logo, by the way).
We'll see what happens, but I suspect we'll get something much more familiar in our supersuit before all is said and done, whether it's the George Reeves look or the Henry Cavill speed suit. I will not miss the Lee design.
So, for the first time since probably 2003, I didn't look at the solicitations for DC Comics' coming books the day they were released. I just forgot to do so. But that's sort of where I'm at with DC these days.
It's time, once again, for my: "Something is Up at DC" Amazing Criswell Psychic Predictions.
Cartoons:
DC is part of WB, which also owns The Cartoon Network. About a year and a half ago, we first heard of the coming "DC Nation" block of cartoons, which never turned into a full block. It was an hour with some small cartoons tucked in, lasting about 80 seconds or so apiece. They were pretty great.
Season 2 of Cartoon Network started about three weeks ago, and then last Saturday - it just wasn't on. They showed a different program in that time slot. The same day we got an announcement that (a) they were pushing the show back to January and (b) DC Animation was releasing a few films, not the least of which was DC's Flashpoint story which led into the New 52.
I'm wondering - and this is just me talking out loud - if DC has decided that they don't want to do the New 52 in their new animated shows, but that was a last minute decision. DC had already released one Justice League movie based in the world of Young Justice, and I assume that Flashpoint would be the same sort of thing - spinning the New 52 Universe into the Young Justice world - or eliminating it so they could do a New 52 Justice League cartoon.
Maybe that isn't happening. Or maybe its a far greater problem to introduce the New 52 to a casual audience than devoted comic shop geeks and its causing all sorts of issues.
Or maybe they're finding that DC comics characters can't draw in an audience for a television program. Honestly, both the Green Lantern cartoon and Young Justice are really, really dark shows. Avengers may be dopey and badly voice-acted, but the characters don't all seem perpetually miserable, and that's the Marvel cartoon, about heroes with real-life problems. Go figure.
But DC and CN pulled the plug on Batman: Brave and the Bold, which was a terrific program, so what do I know?
Or, DC is holding off until the new Batman and other cartoons are in the can and they can have a true programming block of 2 hours or so. Which would be keen.
The bottom line is - WB's investment in DC as a multimedia IP farm just went kaput very publicly on DVR's all across the country.
Meanwhile over in comics - The Supersuit
I have to think someone noticed Superman's new costume is more trouble than its worth.
In the January solicits, Superboy seems to have inherited the current costume, and Superman is back to jeans and t-shirt.
My guess is he winds up with something more movie-centric without the collar, or we get something much closer to the original suit.
I don't think anyone liked that supersuit. And it would have been nice to see two artists draw it the same way. Ie: Do not let Jim Lee design your supersuits anymore.
Meanwhile, Steel's new look is spoiled on the cover for Animal Man. I like John Henry Irons, but have no fixed idea regarding his look except: it's gray or shiny metal. So, this is fine.
At the end of the day, no matter how many jokes you make about the red trunks, etc... Superman is an icon first and a character second. It's a bit like trying to hip up the Coca-Cola label or a Campbell's Soup can. It's a nice design exercise, but on the shelf, its not what people are looking for.
The Wonder Woman pants/ no pants debate was surely of some use to DC. At least they understood that when she's in pants, nobody has any idea what they're looking at and they're trying to mess with 70 years of brand recognition. Its just a bad idea (surely as bad as the current DC logo, by the way).
We'll see what happens, but I suspect we'll get something much more familiar in our supersuit before all is said and done, whether it's the George Reeves look or the Henry Cavill speed suit. I will not miss the Lee design.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)