Watched: 03/30/2025
Format: Criterion
Viewing: First
Director: Michael Mann
There's half of an amazing character driven neo-noir in this film, and then half of an okay thriller.
I think it's the schizm of the two that makes for a frustrating viewing experience where one would be a delight and the other a pleasant enough film, but when the film shifts gears back and forth - and I usually don't mind tonal changes - it just feels like there's missed opportunity on that character study and the better film. Collateral (2004) does get to sail on Michael Mann's slick directing and visuals (look, you can hire whatever DP, but it's Mann), and stellar performances from Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise and a kick-ass set-up that feels rooted in some classic noir.
The movie also co-stars a wide array of names. Jason Statham appears for about twenty seconds. Debi Mazar as well (in our book, there's never enough Mazar). Jada Pinkett-Smith appears. Mark Ruffalo plays an LA cop uncovering what's going on in real time. Javier Bardem. Bruce McGill. Peter Berg.
Our set up is that Jamie Fox plays Max, a cabbie, who picks up a fare, who seems like a charming guy but is actually an assassin, Vincent (Tom Cruise) flown in from points unknown to take out a series of people. Max just wants to squirrel away money for his dream of starting a limo company.
At the first hit, Fox is waiting in his cab for Vincent when he's suddenly involved in the proceedings. Under threat by Vincent, he begins driving him from hit-to-hit. And that could have been enough. The relationship building between the two could have made for a taught thriller driven by the desires and motives of each - and the movie plays with that as they reveal more about themselves and get real about the weaknesses of the other.
But movies have to movie, and so the back 1/3rd of the movie devolves into an action flick that really doesn't make much sense from Max's perspective and undercuts what could have been explosive character work. There's a different last third of this movie somewhere that doesn't involve an extended chase sequence and Max becoming an action hero.
Cruise and Fox are both really great when they want to be (and both have phoned it in upon occasion). And there are really good moments for both - I disagree with the take that Cruise is wooden here - that's just not true at all. There's a fascinating character for both players, and once the movie isn't about the two talking it through, it loses steam even as the actual action ratchets up.
I'm not sure I entirely bought the scene with Felix (Bardem) and Max, but I like the idea well enough, and both sell it.
But what I did like was the notion that Vincent really thinks he's helping Max, even if there's an 80% chance he's going to put a bullet in him by the end of the night. His nihilistic viewpoint which enables him to do what he does has "freed" him, while Vincent believes he'll make his next move, but he won't. It's some really good stuff as they bounce off each other. And you can tell Cruise is leaning all the way into Vincent - and the possibility of opening up a little to Max, but if he does, does that mean Max is done for?
It's good stuff.
I get why the movie gets the praise - because it's almost there for me. But it all feels like an overly complex mousetrap at the end to get us to loop back to Vincent's anecdote, and that could have been done in two or three much cleaner steps.
Anyhoo - I actually liked it. Or large parts of it. And I am not one to complain about Michael Mann, but it does feel like I went from thinking "this movie is incredible" to "yeah, that was good" by the end.
