Pages

Friday, June 21, 2024

Fellini Watch: 8 1/2 (1963)




Watched:  06/20/2024
Format:  Criterion
Viewing:  First
Director:  Federico Fellini


I was unable to find La Dolce Vita streaming, so I had to skip ahead to 8 1/2 (1963) as I continue on my "finally watch a handful of movies from name directors" homework that I've assigned myself.  Obviously I'm checking out Fellini at the moment.  Commenting on my post for La Strada, StevenGH effused a bit about this film, so I didn't mind jumping into the deep end.  

This screening was not taken on due to the passing this week of co-star Anouk Aimée, but the cosmos aligned, and so it's with a farewell salute to the actor that we dove into this movie for the first time.  

Prior to watching this movie, I didn't, honestly, know anything about it other than that it had Mastroianni in the role for which he's best known in America.  So, despite knowing this was a "Top 50 Movies by Critical Consensus" type of film, no one had brought it up with me other than asking if I had seen it - maybe once every few years - and then moving on upon learning I hadn't seen it.

For me, what you may have heard about the reputation of 8 1/2 bore out.  It's both incredibly simple and so complex it's worthy of the endless conversation 60 years of this film existing in critical circles will tell you.  It is about what it is about, while also being the thing that can't be made by the characters in the film.  I'm getting now why a thousand bad films have been made by filmmakers who tried to recapture the lightning in a bottle.  

I don't know if I've ever seen a film this *honest*, where - knowing Fellini was writer, director and ring master of the film - there's no doubt that what we're watching in the screen is a transposition of the real onto celluloid.  Past, present and fantasy mix within the film, and the film seems to play all of these parts for Fellini - down to recasting himself as Marcello Mastroianni (no doubt one of the best male faces to cross the screen) as a true fantasy.  And, look, I don't know how much of this is true - I don't assume this is a 1:1 to Fellini's life, but I do think it taps into something that manages to show a portrait of a character and his challenges and inner-life in a way that is both unique and comes from a place both specific and universal-ish.   

I won't get too much into the cast, but it also includes British actor Barbara Steele, which surprised me when she walked across the screen.  Claudia Cardinale plays more of an idea than a character, and who better to play a concept, really?  The forementioned Anouk Aimée is stunning as the long-suffering wife of Mastroianni, her rage turned into a steely armor.  And dozens of others, none of whom I know as they're Italian actors from 60 years ago.  And I am not here to talk about performances on this one, but there weren't any wrong notes, which I think likely goes without saying.

To be honest, most of the time, it's my feeling that when writers and directors think they should delve into their libido, their strings of romantic and sexual partners and be honest about it, the results are cringe-worthy.  If this movie has a knock against it, it's only that others think they can pull this off and remain interesting and/ or sympathetic.  There are a few that do work (All That Jazz is really something), but a lot more that don't.  Why this works in 8 1/2 is an alchemy of execution of story beats, the use of his past, present and fantasy structure, and that Fellini is clear-eyed about his fictional director.  He sees how people hurt each other, recognizing humiliation for what it is rather than as a comedic crutch.

Like a lot of the films I'll wind up discussing in my Movie Homework Series here on the blog, I don't think I'll have anything new to say.  We're going to be touching some of the most famous, well-regarded cinema on planet Earth, and that means it's been written about in magazines, reviews and academic treatises when it hasn't been the subject of interviews, both primary and secondary.  

What I don't want to do is give these movies short shrift, nor cover well-trod territory, especially when other folks know these movies well.  And, certainly, I'll be returning to this movie, which I'm sure will have deeper impact in new ways when I know where this is going.  But I do appreciate coming in cold, and just sorting out what I was watching as a somewhat pristine experience.

I'll save further commentary on the imitators for another day, for a future re-watch.  There's plenty to discuss in structure, camera work, style, religion on film, libido on film and Claudia Cardinale.  So, perhaps in the future we can return to this movie again.



4 comments:

  1. Oh! I've been awaiting this.

    I'm sure this movie gets better and more complex as one ages as they see it. When I saw it as a 20-ish man it was: "This is existentialism and that life is absurd and Fellini lets it be absurd!"

    I was astounded when my (aged) philosophy professor (Lewis Mackey) said: "It's about impotence! Plain and simple."

    Yours, fittingly, fits somewhere in-between: seeing that yes, it's a man with a great deal of potential looking at some of damage he leaves in his wake while wondering if it's possible to not do so in a world that is fundamentally infinitely silly.

    And to prefigure the future, I was spittin' mad when those hacks at the academy gave "Crash" best picture --- for such a thin, obvious remake of Fellini. In my best French I say "Puh!"

    ...and I'm excited for "La Dolce Vita."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to FIND La Dolce Vita, first! Help me if you can!

    I do appreciate the perspective and kind words on the post.

    I definitely see the read of the film being about impotence, and once you go down that path, I can see how - especially in the context of how people talked about film in the 80's and 90's - how it would be seen as the "pure and simple" answer. So I guess I'm of two minds, depending on your instructor's definition of "impotence". Certainly there's forms of impotence, but I'd argue it's about something more complex that drives the inability to consummate a new film or with one's wife or mistress. And it's not clear to me so much he isn't boffing the mistress so much as he no longer sees the appeal in his boorish girlfriend.

    And I have no doubt he'd make a compelling argument. But as you say - I'd be split down the middle.

    But, yeah, the ending of the film is up there with the all-time greats. Accepting life as the circus and joining in the show is one hell of a finale.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Younger me put "La Dolce Vita" above "8 1/2", but older me has reversed this. They are both great. Austin Public Library has La Dolce Vita criterion Blu Ray.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have a feeling I'm going to come down on "oh, they're just different, but all good" on these. And, thanks for thinking of the library! Little mad at myself I didn't. I'll head over to APL now!

    ReplyDelete

Keep it friendly. Comment moderation is now on. We are not currently able to take Anonymous comments. I apologize.